Now, I feel as though Foxit has become more focused on its ad sales than creating benefit for its users. Initially, the Ask toolbars and the Foxit program promotions didn't bother me so much since I felt the program was still much faster than Adobe. Over time, Foxit has become slower and bulkier.
#SKIM VS PDFPEN PDF#
Since Adobe Acrobat was a bit of a heavier program, it would take forever to load my pdf files and Foxit loaded them much faster. I was a big fan of the Foxit Reader when it first came out.
![skim vs pdfpen skim vs pdfpen](https://freakstree.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/5/0/125067777/941928018.png)
Ask search toolbar combined with installation.still faster than Adobe Acrobat, but not as quick as it once was.But if you want to handle PDF documents and are somewhat attached to any hair you have left on your head, steer way, way clear of Adobe and opt for Foxit instead. It's true that it has stopped being a true "lightweight" alternative, as it grew a lot over the years and be aware of the bundled adware.
#SKIM VS PDFPEN FREE#
The free version features more functionality than Adobe's, it's well designed and has lots of customisation options, it's fast and stable. But Foxit is not just good because it's not Adobe – it's a genuinely good piece of software. I'm sorry if this sounds like more of an Acrobat diatribe than a Foxit review. Don't ask me why, but Adobe found a way to be the worst at handling the document format they invented themselves. Figures are perfectly sharp in the printout from Foxit Reader. Somehow, for all its hour-long pre-processing of the document, Adobe Reader prints a blurry mess of figures, with chroma aberration and all. Good job!Īnd the kicker? Foxit Reader's printout of the same document on the same printer is of much higher quality than the Adobe Reader printout. Some error dialogue pops up, and the printer tray contains only printouts of the first three pages before the job was aborted. None of this creates any issues with Foxit Reader.īut in the end, it's printed, right? Wrong.
![skim vs pdfpen skim vs pdfpen](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfdAjbNWAAIduYD.jpg)
This happens regardless of which printer is selected - local, network, or even just Microsoft's XPS output driver. That's right, three hours for printing a 20-page document. Waiting long enough, the print dialogue finally reaches 100% after 3 hours. Only that it doesn't hang, as an experiment shows. I try to print it, and Adobe seems to hang during "reducing" pages for printing (some form of rasterisation or compositing, I suppose). So this PDF could be considered a somewhat larger one, containing many pictures and weighing in at a total of 15 MB. Foxit handles the same document in a breeze. They just make the document look worse, not render faster. Not even disabling the various smoothing and filtering options have a real effect. I'm on a bloody quad-core i7 processor and 32 gigabytes of RAM, so why is it not possible to scroll fluently through a PDF? Give the mouse scroll wheel a good spin, and it will take Adobe Reader ages to slowly step through the document. Or try to, thanks to the infuriatingly and inexplicably slow scrolling. No such issues in Foxit Reader.įinally, the document is open.
![skim vs pdfpen skim vs pdfpen](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/170706/PDFpen-13-app-screenshot-4-redact-pdfs-mac.jpg)
Nobody at Adobe ever bothered to fix or even acknowledge it. The bug has been known for years and years. This happens if a recently opened document was stored on a network path or external drive which is no longer available. I will base this review on one of the simplest tasks you could imagine wanting to do with a PDF file: opening and printing it.įirst, Adobe Reader almost always freezes for several seconds after opening a file. I don't know how they managed to make it worse, buggier, more unstable, more cumbersome to use, larger and slower with every new version, without ever fixing any of the bugs people have been reporting for often 10 years or longer. However, the state of affairs is particularly sad when it comes to the Acrobat Reader. Adobe is always good for examples of particulary bad software.